User talk:SilentMatt Psychedelic
Welcome!
[edit]Hi SilentMatt Psychedelic! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! TylerBurden (talk) 06:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Your photos
[edit]Thank you for the addition of so many photos. While photos can improve Wikipedia articles, please note that Wikipedia is not a photo gallery for personal photos. I've been cleaning up some of the additions you have made, but it will take a while. I urge you to read MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE and WP:IG. Thank you for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- I put images in that were directly mentioned in the articles. In particular the new renovations to the Hoover Plant and St. Pauls school that are mentioned in North Canton's page. I put specific photos of GlenOak High School that were mentioned such as the adjacent park and football stadium. I'm not making wikipedia a photo gallery for personal photos. I'm specifically going to towns that have no photos or outdated ones or are under represented. They have some beautiful buildings that should be seen. Does not a good photo entice someone to click on its page? I will be more conscientious of how many photos I add in the future. SilentMatt Psychedelic (talk) 21:11, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- Of course adding images is encouraged, but like anything, there are limits to how many images reasonably fit into a given article and where they should be placed, which is why the image policies exist. Those policies make sure the article is easy to read and doesn't just become an image gallery (I've seen instances where editors just insert their own photos even when another photo already exists of the same thing, so we end up, say, with multiple photos of the front door). Definitely avoid placing images in the lead section, and subheadings should generally only have one image, unless the section has multiple paragraphs, and thus has room for additional photos. Most articles should have a link to the gallery on Wikimedia Commons at the bottom of the page, so if readers want to see additional images, they can go there. The images in the Commons category are also readily available to use if/when the article is expanded and can fit more images.
- Many, if not most, high school articles do need some more pictures, but they also need significant expansion of the written parts so they can actually accommodate those photos. Most high school articles are too small to fit very many photos, if any beyond the one in the infobox. If you look at Theodore Roosevelt High School (Kent, Ohio), that gives a reasonable idea of how images should be placed by section, including the infobox (generally, if the school has a seal or logo on top, the photo of the building shows up at the bottom). The link to the Commons category ("Wikimedia Commons has media related to...") is at the bottom of the page. The Kent, Ohio article also can give a good idea of image placement. --JonRidinger (talk) 18:57, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jon. It is refreshing to hear from an experienced editor who isn't an egomaniac! I have checked out your excellent work on those Kent pages. I have learned from my mistakes and have only been going to high schools with no photos and then only adding one photo to their page. SilentMatt Psychedelic (talk) 16:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Again, your image contributions are much appreciated, especially for articles that lack photos. Nothing wrong with getting "updated" photos of places that have them already and replacing the ones in the article, especially in places where there have been major changes since the last photo. Since the Commons category is there, the old photo will still be available to see even if it isn't featured in the article itself. Always available for questions if needed too! -- JonRidinger (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, thank you for the advice! I have seen a few not so great photos of places that I thought could be updated. Shalersville was a glaring one. Thanks for the permission to change them! ;) SilentMatt Psychedelic (talk) 20:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Again, your image contributions are much appreciated, especially for articles that lack photos. Nothing wrong with getting "updated" photos of places that have them already and replacing the ones in the article, especially in places where there have been major changes since the last photo. Since the Commons category is there, the old photo will still be available to see even if it isn't featured in the article itself. Always available for questions if needed too! -- JonRidinger (talk) 19:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jon. It is refreshing to hear from an experienced editor who isn't an egomaniac! I have checked out your excellent work on those Kent pages. I have learned from my mistakes and have only been going to high schools with no photos and then only adding one photo to their page. SilentMatt Psychedelic (talk) 16:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)