User talk:Silver Marmot

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Izehar (talk) 22:25, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

G. W. Bush

Thanks for reverting vandalism, but please refrain from shallow liberal-bashing. Gilliamjf 22:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Unblock

I've unblocked you as you clearly aren't User:MARMOT. But please do grit your teeth and be as polite as possible in edit summaries :-) The policy pages are Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Brusqueness in edit summaries is regarded as particularly bad because they can't be edited - David Gerard 12:33, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Washington House Elections

Hey, thanks for adding in the Republicans! I was hoping someone would help us keep track of everyone from all sides. Chadlupkes 19:36, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Howling Monkey

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Howling Monkey. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) 06:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Howling Monkey Speedy Deletion

A tag has been placed on Howling Monkey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bielle 02:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Will Sohn

An article that you have been involved in editing, Will Sohn, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Sohn. Thank you. JakeZ (talk) 17:23, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Alan Gottlieb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Gottlieb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Gottlieb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Viriditas (talk) 02:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)