Jump to content

User talk:Simondo59

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of Simon Dodd

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Simon Dodd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Leonard^Bloom (talk) 03:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have removed the speedy deletion tag and (slightly) expanded the article. Assuming that you are the subject, you need to be aware of the conflict of interest guidelines when writing about yourself. So long as you use appropriate sources you should be fine. Cheers Kevin (talk) 04:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Simon Dodd for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Dodd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Dodd (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Bejnar (talk) 06:32, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]