User talk:Sisterwendy
Welcome
[edit]
|
January 2015
[edit] Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Ari Lehman, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Meters (talk) 00:47, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- I suggest that you read WP:BRD. When you make an edit and it is undone for a valid reason, you are required to discuss it on the article's talk page before it can be restored. The large quote was, in my opinion, correctly removed the first time. I will remove it again and you can attempt to gain consensus to add it on the talk page. Meters (talk) 00:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ari Lehman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Sneaky vandalism:removing cited material with a false edit summary Meters (talk) 03:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Ari
[edit]Listen you Ari crony. No negative attention is allowed? Then why is positive? Should we edit OJ Simpson's bio and talk about how positive it was that he killed someone? What about Hitler? Ari is a criminal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:ce1d:9720:ac7f:15fb:f82d:870b (talk • contribs) 20:17, February 1, 2015
As interested users and contributors of wikipedia, we should endeavor to maintain this site's standards. Don't you agree? Comments made should maintain objectivity, be factual, neutral, and comply with wikipedia's guidelines and standards for editing and civility. Please refer to them, when editing, adding, and writing to others, user 2602:306:ce1d:9720:ac7f:15fb:f82d:870b. Sisterwendy (talk) 20:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC) sisterwendy
Oh please, you are clearly a personal friend of him. He's a deadbeat film extra who hardly belongs on Wikipedia. But the truth needs to be put up. Why don't you ask him what happened to his original band members? Or why Cleaver left? Yeah, I think we should dedicate an entire section on how Ari doesn't pay his band members.
Please refer to Wikipedia standards about neutrality. I'm terribly sorry that you seem to be using this public page as a personal platform. You clearly demonstrate a conflict of interest with the article and subject. sisterwendySisterwendy (talk) 00:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Ban this user
[edit]You need to be banned. Your non-stop Ari propaganda on here is cringe-worthy and it is false. 2602:306:CE1D:9720:AC7F:15FB:F82D:870B (talk) 23:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
User 2602:306:CE1D:9720:AC7F:15FB:F82D:870B: I want to thank you for your note. I always look forward to feedback on work but I must comment on your tone. Please refer to Wikipedia standards for BLP, bullying, and talk guidelines. I'm terribly sorry that you seem to be using this Wikipedia public page as a personal platform. You clearly demonstrate a conflict of interest with the article's subject Ari Lehman. Additionally, please refrain from leaving messages for me that are hostile nature. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiBullying https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines . I hope you will reconsider your recent interactions. We are here to help Wikipedia as a group. sisterwendySisterwendy (talk) 15:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]Why thank you - you're too kind, and I too undeserving. :-)
Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
So modest. :) I look forward to being part of this great space. See you on the Wiki pages. sisterwendySisterwendy (talk) 17:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
lehman
[edit]No, YOU clearly demonstrate a conflict of interest with Ari. He has VERY littles, and you clearly are one of them. Not a single person would be glued to his Wikipedia page 24/7 unless its a relative of his. 2602:306:CE1D:9720:AC7F:15FB:F82D:870B (talk) 04:37, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Pursuinginquiry (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 01:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC) |