User talk:Sivmetavvm

Welcome!

Hi Sivmetavvm! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 19:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OSM Maritime Group (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

THis looks like a directory entry. Please see WP:NOTDIRECTORY. What is notable about this corporation

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OSM Maritime Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OSM Maritime Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sivmetavvm! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:OSM Maritime Group has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:OSM Maritime Group. Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:13, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello Sivmetavvm. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:OSM Maritime Group, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sivmetavvm. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sivmetavvm|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

"Actually, we are the #1 in Crew management in the world" from your recent edit summary suggests that you are intimately associated with the organisation. If so you have a duty to make a formal declaration one way or the other. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making that declaration. I've copied iyt to your user page and also added a template to the draft. By making the declaration you have ensured that you are not blocked for undeclared paid editing. Thank you for understanding that payment is broadly construed as any tangible benefit.

I very rarely review a draft more than once, so another reviewer will take this iterative process forwards. My advice to you is now to read WP:NCORP with care to seek to ensure that your article passes it, and to continue to understand excellence of referencing. We always look for quality instead of quantity. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 11:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sivmetavvm, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by OSM Maritime Group for their contributions to Wikipedia.

Your contribution is appreciated

Your submission at Articles for creation: OSM Maritime Group (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OSM Maritime Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OSM Maritime Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 13:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OSM Maritime Group (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HighKing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a company/organization therefore WP:NCORP guidelines apply. There are particular criteria for establishing the notability of a company As per WP:SIRS *each* reference must meet the criteria for establishing notability. We need multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. This is the criteria where most of your references fail. References cannot rely only and solely on information provided by the company. Most of the references in the article are based entirely on company announcements. Equally, references that rely entirely on quotations, press releases, interviews also fail ORGIND. Before resubmitting, please locate references that meet NCORP, in particular ORGIND/CORPDEPTH criteria.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OSM Maritime Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OSM Maritime Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HighKing⁺⁺ 12:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

a simple work is turned into a mission impossible. Listen up my friend. If it's not important to have the 7th global company in Ship technical management and FIRST global company in Crew management, hence on average, 3RD SHIP MANAGER in the world visible on Wikipedia it's up to you.

Now about the "We need multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content"."

The first is Lloyd's List (Google it please. NO, in fact you have it on Wikipedia so kindly READ ABOUT THIS SOURCE)

The second is "Top 5 Crew Management Companies in the world 2021". Maritime Zone. 13 December 2021.

So, these are at least two sources with deep (?) information on the company containing "Independent Content". Obviously we have different perception of how this sentence matches with the proven evidence.

I'm tired. Proceed as you wish. Our page outranks Wikipedia anyway. Sivmetavvm (talk) 06:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:OSM Maritime Group

Hello, Sivmetavvm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OSM Maritime Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OSM Maritime Group (June 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Carpimaps was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Carpimaps ^{talk to me!} 14:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OSM Maritime Group (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OSM Maritime Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 02:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE IT. I WILL NOT PAY YOUR INDIAN COLLEAGUES 750$ TO HAVE IT PUBLISHED. SCREW WIKIPEDIA 213.7.215.121 (talk) 05:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]