User talk:SonaMani1

About Guntur Karam Box Office

Bro i dont get even after 5 days the bo is at 108-127 but we can see changes in hanuman movie

There is no reliable source for the article. SonaMani1 (talk) 17:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok but i still dont get it reliable source for hanuman is more than guntur karam Guru Deepak y (talk) 17:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Three reverts rule (WP:3RR)

Hi SonaMani1. Please note that you have recently made 5 reverts on Guntur Kaaram. There is a strict edit warring rule against making more than 3 reverts on a page within 24 hours, with some exceptions that do not appear to apply (for example, reverting unsourced edits is an exception only within the biography of living person context). Please do not make further reverts on the page, or you might be blocked, even if the revert is otherwise reasonable. If you believe a listed exception applies, state which one in your edit summary. SilverLocust 💬 19:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This same warning applies to List of Telugu films of 2024 and List of Indian films of 2024 and any other page. A second block for edit warring is unlikely to be as short as your first. SilverLocust 💬 19:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 07:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given the extensive edit warring on multiple articles you have been blocked indefinitely until you can convince an administrator that you understand what edit warring is and that it will not continue. You have gone well past WP:3RR on multiple articles in the past few days without using the talk page of any of them. At List of Indian films of 2024 you made 5 reverts on January 18 and 6 on January 17. At List of Telugu films of 2024 you made 6 reverts on January 18, and 5 on January 17. At Guntur Kaaram you made 6 reverts on January 18 and 10 on January 17. - Aoidh (talk) 07:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please look my reverts. I've reverted vandalised contributions of User:SP1CF. The user is adding gross of Guntur Kaaram with unreliable source, the collection which posted by filmmakers in Twitter. I've said the user many times that "collection from makers are considered unreliable" as you can see in my contributions. Ive all warned the user many times. But he was not responding. I understood that the user is not going to reply even if I discussed in talk pages of these articles. So please understand and unblock my account as I'm not doing vandalism to these articles. From now onwards I will discuss in talk pages of article. Please unblock my account. Thanks. SonaMani1 (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edits you reverted are not vandalism, and your belief that the other editor will not discuss on talk does not mean anything; you also were unwilling to discuss on talk. You both were edit warring egregiously without discussion across multiple articles and you were warned about this exact same scenario when you resumed edit warring after your previous unblock expired. From Wikipedia:Edit warring: An editor who repeatedly restores their preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether those edits are justifiable. Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense. - Aoidh (talk) 15:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see [1]. I've informed the user about "collection from makers are not considered reliable" via summary. User:77Survivor also have undid the user's edit [2]. Now I understood to discuss in talk pages. I will do it in my future edits. Please unblock my account. Thanks. SonaMani1 (talk) 15:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read what I wrote above again, as I have seen the edit you linked to and is exactly the type of edit I'm talking about above. The issue is not merely one of discussion. - Aoidh (talk) 15:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understood to discuss it in talk pages before reverting. Please tell, will you unblock my account? For that what should I do? SonaMani1 (talk) 15:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you would need to do has already been explained above. - Aoidh (talk) 15:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's that? Could you tall once more. SonaMani1 (talk) 15:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 15:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]