User talk:Souzie sabbagh

February 2015

Hello, I'm DiscantX. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Bajrangi Bhaijaan— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Discant X 12:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bajrangi Bhaijaan with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Discant X 12:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bajrangi Bhaijaan, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bajrangi Bhaijaan was changed by Souzie sabbagh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9648 on 2015-02-10T12:53:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bajrangi Bhaijaan. Discant X 12:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. seicer | talk | contribs 13:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Souzie sabbagh. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:21, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]