User talk:SparklesWins69

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:41, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SparklesWins69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You have blocked without a reason I commented a reply and did not edit one article or field yet and only asked for a edit who someone else needs to edit as the page is on semi protection and I'm still studying, so you are not allowed to block me. See my user page, I only replied to something and never edited anything yet, I'm studying calm first before editing, you have no right to block and by the way I'm off this page, as this page makes no riable sources for any point to be on false misleading informational people misleading and attacking others in relationships and trying to gain their goal of making by hurting others throughout that. Don't forget by law that is forbidden what those do and I just tried to clear the subject for all our sake.

Decline reason:

You are confused. We certainly can block you and did block you, and a reason was given. Your edits to Talk:Jason Momoa were significantly disruptive. It's unclear if you are trolling or lack sufficient understanding of English to communicate here in an effective manner. Yamla (talk) 21:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 21:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which part of that did you find confusing? --Yamla (talk) 14:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

surely the block is not permitted to attack a person straight away with a block and surely that you say you can block I can take the whole Wikipedia page of the internet forever and have Wikipedia cancelling their work so it's not existent anymore and definitely with all that misleading information you all add with your obsession on false media, as usual for all riable sources it is ok but not for all unreliable sources and definitely on living people's life's most is misleading information of false media and point and you have no right attacking people and adding ups like this while some of the inner system can trick into other ips and abuse the subject to have other attacked because others just even mislead with ip addresss by switching them to another and that even by jealous people working for the law and getting on the tools. And you don't know what you add to people life's when some add particular to Wikipedia and a whole line of a family even needs to do around with people who have something because of named and other have that last name. 80.187.71.224 (talk) 11:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]