User talk:Srazin

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vladimir Lenin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vladimir Lenin was changed by Srazin (u) (t) deleting 12674 characters on 2009-08-15T17:55:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:Vladimir Lenin, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. RolandR 00:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 00:59, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Srazin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did nothing to deserve these arbitrary and corrupt actions to be taken against my account. Why wasn't the person calling me a "vandal" banned indefinitely for violating policy? These actions really just how bankrupt Wikipedia is in terms of credibility.

Decline reason:

When you were banned as User:Jacob Peters, you lost the privilege of editing Wikipedia. Because you are under a community ban, and not a simple block, administrators do not have the authority to undo a block on any account you are using. If you think you've fully solved the problems that led to your ban, you can follow the instructions at the end of User talk:Jacob Peters to appeal the ban, but since you are still creating sockpuppet accounts, I don't think the problems are indeed fully solved. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:25, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.