User talk:Ssh016

This is Ssh016's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ssh016/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:47, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Made changes that meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations, and have cited sources using footnotes. Ssh016 (talk) 23:09, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ssh016! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:47, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Anirban Chakraborti has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anirban Chakraborti. Thanks! Bobby Cohn (talk) 01:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anirban Chakraborti (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Likely meets WP:NPROF but the article is written too promotionally without proper citations. Wikipedia cannot say “known for significant contributions” when the citation only demonstrates the contributions. Someone else (reliable and |independent sources) has to say that first part first. Wikivoice is allowed to say things like “has conducted research in” for example, as that is less promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anirban Chakraborti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 01:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and good job

Hi Ssh016, I’ve given a lot of feedback on the draft article above as the article shows promise. I don’t make this offer often but I would be happy to re-review the article when the appropriate changes are made. You are welcome to let me know, or ask any questions if something doesn’t make sense, on my talk page. Kindly, Bobby Cohn (talk) 01:56, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anirban Chakraborti

Following cleanup and copy-editing, I've published your draft article and it can now be viewed at Anirban Chakraborti. Please remember that if you have an external connection to the subject, to not make changes to the article directly, but to abide by our WP:COI policies and request all changes using the Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard/COI.

Thanks for your contributions to the project. Kindly, Bobby Cohn (talk) 16:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]