User talk:StatPak

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, StatPak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of "Consejo Previsional Mundial''

The article "Consejo Previsional Mundial'' has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not English

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 15:47, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish

did you want to create this on Spanish wikipedia? If so, you need to go to http://es.wikipedia.org

Or click here >> es:Consejo Previsional Mundial

Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 15:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah: you're right- my mistake. Pls delete the Consejo Previsional Mundial in the ENGLISH Wikipedia. Thanks StatPak

Skype warning

Please note that at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Globalization, also introduced some extraneous text around some numerical characters. This may be due to a combination of your browser and Skype trying to identify and highlight telephone numbers. Please double-check any edits you may perform that include numbers, as this may introduce unnecessary characters into the page. Thank you. Razvan Socol (talk) 14:43, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JTW Article on Chinese economy

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 18:31, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure this qualifies as "advertising" or "soapboxing", and I'm not sure you've actually read the quote in question... I've only added an article outlining a moderately alternative view of the topic at hand, SUMMARIZING a perpective widely shared by many MAINSTREAM Asian and European economists, this right after a sentence exposing the views of conservative/Republican congressional aides. This approach is perfectly in line with Wikipedia's tradition of objectivity as it renders the paragraph in question more precise in fact and more balanced in spirit. But I won't argue with you any further: won't revert to the previous version, even though I think your editing is clearly unfounded & abusive. StatPak (talk)

Thanks for responding.

Let's be clear. I'm concerned that you are specifically focusing on M. Nicolas J. Firzli references, not just the one reference.

If you feel a single author deserves such recognition across multiple Wikipedia articles, please discuss the matter on the article talk pages, and please be aware that any contributions need have a neutral tone. --Ronz (talk) 16:51, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt reply.

Like I said, the JTW article in question has a rather neutral stance/tone ("outlining a moderately alternative view of the topic at hand, summarizing a perpective widely shared by many mainstream Asian and European economists") + it was translated & published in several journals (Ankara, Beirut, Beijing...).

More importantly, the adjunction of this reference made the paragraph at hand more balanced/neutral/objective.

But, this is not a crucial issue... => Not worth arguing endlessly.

Have a nice weekend. --StatPak (talk)

Again, I'm concerned with the M. Nicolas J. Firzli references, not just the single op-ed. --Ronz (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I found this page from a search. I'm in the process of removing a vast amount of spam from Firzli-related websites. He apparently runs several "think tanks" which publish his views, and he or an associate have added his views to numerous articles. Will Beback talk 23:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moorehaus for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Will Beback talk 07:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Native Latin Speaker?

In what way are you a native Latin speaker?--Herb-Sewell (talk) 16:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]