Jump to content

User talk:Stcharger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Marian Hossa, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 19:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep your personal opinions and commentary out of the articles. Thanks. - Rjd0060 (talk) 20:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chris Osgood. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baker College edits[edit]

You need to justify your edits to the article Baker College on the talk page. Removing relevant content without consensus is vandalism and can result in loss of your editing privileges. --50.4.162.0 (talk) 11:18, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to vandalize the article Baker College, you could lose your editing privileges.--67.149.239.17 (talk) 10:16, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Baker College Edits[edit]

All of the information you removed on the Baker College article is sourced and up to date.

If you have a dispute, take it up on the talk page. Removing sourced content without consensus is vandalism! --35.16.83.222 (talk) 12:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


You continue to edit out information that paints Baker College in a negative light, which is sourced directly from the college itself. This behavior shows a bias you have towards the college. Your edits must be stopped, as 50.4.162.0, 35.16.83.222, 67.149.239.17 have said, and including my NPOV flagging has stated.

Some of your edit reasons state the information is not true, yet this information is backed by verifiable information. Your claims are not, and therefore are inappropriate to delete cited information on your personal view or research.

Please stop reverting the page, as a further edit will result in a formal complaint. Thank you. -robert smith30 23:49, 7 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert smith30 (talkcontribs)