User talk:Stephen/Archive August 2007

Lake Tour Bike Trek

Hi Stephen. Would you please undelete the Lake Tour Bike Trek. I contested the prod and opened it up for wider discussion, but it got deleted before a full review took place. After doing a bit of research I can see that there is sufficient notability for the event for it to remain an article in Category:Bicycle tours. It simply needs a rewrite not deleting. Jaranda had undeleted it at my request: User_talk:Jaranda#Lake_Tour_Bike_Trek Regards. SilkTork 16:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ina Garten

Thanks muchly for your help with the vandal at the Ina Garten article. Undoing her vandalism was getting tiresome; I appreciate the speedy action! -- Air.dance 01:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Solunar Theory

Hello Stephen, The article which was deleted is widely recognised as being from a reliable book source: "The Story of Solunar Theory", Moon~up Moon~down by John Alden Knight. Millions of people worldwide support and use the theory when fishing & hunting. There are many software applications worldwide that implement the theory used by millions of people. Over 150 newspapers in the USA & thousands of web-sites publish solunar tables based on the theory. Solunar Tables are also published by Field Stream magazine in the USA, one of the most respected sources for fishing & hunting worldwide. Please re-instate the article. --Wiki.australia 03:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Un-prodded at your request --Stephen ^1-800-STEVE 03:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:0001

I noticed that you were the last to block him, so I thought I should report this to you. (Added something unreferenced about an internet piracy leak.) Cliff smith 15:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elonka 2

Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months! If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, --El on ka 03:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Stephen/Identity

You've protected User:Stephen/Identity and transcluded a {{pp-semi-protected}} template; you might want to replace it with a tranclusion {{pp-protected}}, just so the icon is more intuitive.

Thanks! — madman bum and angel 16:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up --Stephen ^1-800-STEVE 03:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's back

User:65.30.186.233 appears to be my webstalker. Lara ♥Love 17:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Thank god for that! 65.30.186.250 23:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)" - I didn't work. Lara ♥Love 03:12, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AussieJr, Pirtek and socks

Hi Stephen. You may want to look at Vortex Racing (talk · contribs) and Franklin Racing (talk · contribs) as well. -- Mattinbgn/^talk 07:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I missed the latter. --Stephen ^1-800-STEVE 07:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the latter wasn't a user? AussieJr threatened that he had a few computers from which to create accounts so he'll probably try some more... --Stephen ^1-800-STEVE 07:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He made one or two edits to talk pages of deleted articles. I think it was only created today. I may have got the name wrong but it was along those lines. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Franklin Jr. was my little contribution to all this. Thanks for your help. Cheers, Mattinbgn/^talk 07:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pirtek

Why have you blocked my son. His user name is Pirtek? He has never posted a mean, of bad article, And his on here to try and improve, pages on Aussie Racing drivers, as he has done so.

Thank You Franklin Racing Team 23:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gtadoc

Hi. I'd like to confirm that the comments attributed to you, but assigned to an anonymous IP address by the system, were actually left by you. Here is the diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGtadoc&diff=150140731&oldid=150075074 If they are authrnetic, for the record, the objections to Gtadoc's behavior are simply that he has been dishonest in his representatation of sources and of my actions. Both are easily verified, so it is not a matter of unexplained personal attacks. He is simply not being honest, and you can verify the facts yourself without any side-taking.

They are not my comments, so I've removed them as a misrepresentation --Stephen ^1-800-STEVE 09:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Nordzee & RNI

Parkstreet17 aka Deathwatch2006 is vandalising a number of articles including Radio North Sea International once again. And the related sock puppet, User59, is doing the same to Radio Nordzee. Grateful if you could arrange to block the offender.Phase4 13:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment request

Hi there, would you be so kind as to provide an indepenant neutral opinion of the image Construccionkaiserrick.jpg at the section of the same name on the talk page of Richmond Medical Center here please? Thank you very much as this may help to alleviate a current debate over its inclusion.Cholga^talK! 01:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CSD AutoReason Updated

Attention spamlist! I've just updated CSD AutoReason to account for the new image deletion page. If you'd just hard refresh (Ctrl+F5 in most browsers), you'll get the new version and be on your way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ^demon (talk • contribs) 17:53, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

Blocking Me

Why did you jam me? I didn't make any legal threat. I don't know what you are talking about. 207.69.139.133 02:34, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Bully[reply]

zeitgeist the movie

zeitgeist the movie has been protected, so that no one can create an article about it. The original reasons for protection are no longer valid since this movie is now widely shared on the Internet and is considered and culturally interesting work.

Nobrain 09:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)nobrain[reply]

Deleted article

Hey, sorry to bother, but I have a bone to pick with you. I was away on vacation and havent been on, but now I'm back and see that you have deleted an article that I created. You deleted it citing

(CSD A7(Bio): Biographical article that does not assert significance)

when it was not biographical in nature at all. It was an article on a designer breed of dog. You also did not notify me that the article was up for deletion, or that it was deleted. I do not feel this was fair. If you could please contact me to discuss this article I'd greatly appreciate it. Thank you, YeLLeY511 01:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]