User talk:SteveSeidel
AfD nomination of VinNEBRASKA Foundation
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, VinNEBRASKA Foundation, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VinNEBRASKA Foundation. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Warrah (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
{{help me}}
why am I a "Non-notable local nonprofit" when you have large national 'non'-profits listed?? I have worked with them. I think we are far more notable??
SteveSeidel (talk) 02:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- We have guidelines on notability for organizations, including a section on non-commercial organizations. These guidelines define what is and is not notable in Wikipedia. Intelligentsium 02:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- (e/c) Hi Steve. Please read Wikipedia:Notability as well as a subject specific notability guideline applicable here, Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Notability here does not have the vernacular meaning. Notability here means recognition by the wider world by substantive treatment in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Parse those words carefully. The charity's own website is not independent nor are places printing press releases and so on. Reliable sources means just what you would expect: newspapers, non-vanity published books, television shows, documentaries, magazine articles and so on (not wikis, blogs, unrecognized websites, etc.). Significant means we are not looking for sources here that mention the subject in passing but those that discuss it in some depth. The best way you can respond to the articles for deletion debate is to cite to reliable, independent sources in the article and expand its content using them. Note also, that just because an article has been taken to AFD does not mean that it will be deleted. Others may look for sources and find them, but if you care, don't wait. As for comparisons to other articles that exist, please see WP:WAX. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:VinNEBRASKA logo.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:VinNEBRASKA logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 00:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:VinNEBRASKA2 logo.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:VinNEBRASKA2 logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 00:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 05:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.