User talk:Stevecurwin

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Stevecurwin for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Karrmann 22:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Karrmann 22:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Karrmann 22:05, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Pontiac Montana. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru 22:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Pontiac Montana, you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 22:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pontiac Montana. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Martial BACQUET 22:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Karrmann 22:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks

I've blocked this account for 24 hours for introducing content without sources, however you were also engaged in a revert war. I've also indefinitely blocked your other account, and suggest you read the sock puppetry policy. Addhoc 00:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]