User talk:Sthatdc

Just a heads up

I already know you'll blank this notice one you've read it. I'm also aware this is your right to do so. Just wanted to let you know that it would probably work better if you state why you want your entry to stay over on the talk page for Chronic Lyme disease. There's already a discussion opened about this issue.

If you fail to use the talkpage and keep reverting , you can be blocked (not by me, I'm not an admin), and be aware that simply communicating by edit summaries isn't acceptable either.

Use the talk page, make your case, and if you get consensus, you'll be fine. Necromonger...We keep what we kill 12:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My edits were just common sense. I did not expect that anyone would object. Those who claimed to object have refused to explain why. "Here are some edits and here are the reasons for them." "I object to your edits." "Oh really, why is that?" "I'm not telling you." Sthatdc (talk) 00:04, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from writing things that are not true.

As just one example, you were asked

"you removed the word harmful, as in of the treatments provided by people outside the scientific mainstream, 'the most controversial and harmful is long-term antibiotic therapy, particularly intravenous antibiotics'. Why did you remove this? For example, do you think that there are even more harmful therapies in reasonably common use, or that it is a harmless treatment?"[1]

That's a specific objection that you did not respond to. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Chronic Lyme disease. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv🍁 01:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trolling about copyright violation

You have claimed to be removing a copyright violation at Chronic Lyme disease, but no matter how many people ask you to identify the text that's supposed to be copied, and the supposed source for it, all they get from you is aggression and extraordinary claims that if they can't guess (how?), they are "illiterate" or whatever.[2] Stop it. Either provide a link to the supposed source, so that more experienced users can see whether or not there is an actual copyright violation, or else stop going on about it, before I block you for trolling and for spreading battleground vibes and bad air on talkpages. Bishonen | talk 15:50, 21 December 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Admin noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Guy (help!) 01:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Best known for IP. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:32, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]