User talk:StruthCrikey

Welcome!

Hello, StruthCrikey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EvergreenFir (talk) 00:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notification - BLP & AP2

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EvergreenFir (talk) 00:25, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ku Klux Klan

How is it that the KKK is touted as a far right extremist group, when the absolute opposite is true?

The KKK was founded by Democrats to appose Republican policies. StruthCrikey (talk) 00:46, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Southern strategy, Dixiecrat, and this PolitiFact article. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention that the Republicans were the progressive party in the 19th century and the Democrats were conservative/reactionary. That changed in the 20th century. Why would you think that everything was the same 150 years ago? Please read the encyclopedia and learn a little history. Acroterion (talk) 02:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The left-right polarization of the two parties occurred in the 20th century, with FDR and Reagan. Karl Marx for example endorsed Abraham Lincoln. August Willich became a general in the Union army, while Joseph Weydemeyer became a lieutenant colonel. Both were well known Marxists. Fiorello La Guardia, the New York City mayor who supported FDR had also been a socialist. Robert M. La Follette, who was a Progressive Party presidential candidate in 1924 supported by the Socialist Party, had been a Republican. OTOH, Congressman Larry McDonald who was head of the right-wing John Birch Society was a Democrat.

There's also a Neo-Confederate theory that the Civil War was not about slavery, but about freedom, i.e., the freedom of Southerners to govern their states without big government in Washington telling them what to do. In that narrative, the South is right-wing, while the North is left-wing.

TFD (talk) 02:33, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]