User talk:Sue.sue808

Speedy deletion nomination of Johnny Keenan

Hello Sue.sue808,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Johnny Keenan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Zappa O Mati 20:46, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Johnny Keenan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny Keenan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Keenan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CtP (t • c) 20:47, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Johnny Keenan

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Johnny Keenan, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.johnnykeenan.com/about_01.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Johnny Keenan and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Johnny Keenan, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Johnny Keenan with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Johnny Keenan. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Johnny Keenan saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! JohnCD (talk) 23:06, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is only the middle part of the article which is an obvious copyright violation. You need either to arrange that the actual copyright holder makes a formal release, as explained above, or rewrite the material in your own words. If you do that, be aware that just altering a few words is not enough, it must be a complete rewrite - see Wikipedia:Copy-paste and Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing for advice. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 23:11, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]