User talk:Sumivec

Speedy deletion of Jakub Auguston

A tag has been placed on Jakub Auguston requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Soaringgoldeneagle (talk) 10:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Czech presidents

Klaus is the second president. Špidla was an acting president. It's not an uncommon thing by any means. And unless you can provide a reliable source that says something along the lines of "No, Vladimír Špidla did not execute the office President of the Czech Republic in an acting capacity by any means during the vacancy of 3 February 2003 – 7 March 2003 after Václav Havel left office and before Václav Klaus took office" as opposed to my source which says that he did, Špidla should remain. Therequiembellishere (talk) 20:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry, but you do not understend Czech political system at all. Spidla was not "acting" president. Czech Constitution do not know even term like it. In case like this, Czech government (prime minister), Czech Parlliment (chair of Chamber of Deputies), Constitution Court and other bodies are shering presidential power. Nothin like US vicepresident. It is quite crazy, that you are explaining me Czech political system, even with virtualy zero experience with Czech polical system :-( I hope, that you trust Czech wiki - please see articles [Havel], [Klaus]. --Sumivec (talk) 21:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not like the United States is the only country with acting leaders. Several people come into power this way. And no, a wiki is not a reliable source. Therequiembellishere (talk) 21:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mind your tongue. We do have a civility policy. ALL wikis are unreliable sources according to policy and unless you CAN find a reliable source, that information can be subject to deletion (yes, according to policy). As it is, I HAVE found a source. You're not an extremely new editor, you should know this. Therequiembellishere (talk) 22:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cohn-Bendit

[1]: nobody cares about, the 15 minutes of fame in Czech media are over. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 10:59, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Sumivec! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 526 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Luboš Dobrovský - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]