User talk:Super Ted

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Vandalism of Ingleby Barwick article[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Ingleby Barwick, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Andrew Duffell 15:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

RE:Pete Doherty Picture[edit]

Even though he has given permission to post on wikipedia, there is a conflict with the licensing terms (images on WP must be licensed for commercial use). I posted a topic at I also emailed him about licensing conflict, but I haven't gotten a response yet.--Fallout boy 20:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

One place to look for free license images of musicians is flickr, where images can be filtered by CC license [1] [2]. As for the recent uploads of the Lib members, I probably need to nag that user about using copyrighted content since those appear to be magazine scans which are neither free licensed nor fair use.--Fallout boy 10:51, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
The problem with using the magazine cover tag is that we are only supposed to use magazine covers to illustrate the issue in question. I would recommend emailing Andrew Kendall to get permission to license commercially.--Fallout boy 22:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Admin mop.PNG Hello Super Ted, how are you? Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (88/3/1), so I am now an administrator. I am very humbled by your vote and grateful. Please let me know if at any stage you require assistance, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an administrator. Once again thank you and with kind regards Gryffindor 17:48, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Revert of Wikipedia: Reliable sources[edit]

I request that you restore the change made by Rjensen which added "To help users find additional reliable information on the topic" to the list of reasons that sources should be cited. Your rational that "External Links section is where users look for additional information on a topic" is incomplete. For one thing, it does not account for books and other printed matter. Also, I might not be interested in getting further information about the entire article, I might want further information about just one paragraph in an article. Perhaps someone quoted a sentence from a speech, and I want to read the whole speech. A citation to the source of the speech would be perfect for that. Gerry Ashton 19:41, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

WRT54G's Third-party firmware projects[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:External links. External links belong in an external link section at the end of an article. Nearly all the links that I deleted already exist in an External links section on the appropriate article. The OpenWRT external link is on the OpenWRT page, the Sveasoft external link is on the Sveasoft page.

If you gather all the links together on one page, you also get into Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not territory. Specifically the "Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files" section.

Does that answer your question? AlistairMcMillan 17:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:Ingleby Barwick Crest.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 09:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Libertines Group Picture.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Libertines Group Picture.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree 16:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cillit Bang logo.jpg)[edit]

Nuvola apps important blue.svg Thanks for uploading Image:Cillit Bang logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cillit Bang logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cillit Bang logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate[edit]


Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

DiptanshuTalk 06:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.