User talk:Supernature91

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Cheeseman[edit]

Hello Supernature91,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alex Cheeseman for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Piandcompany (talk) 12:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alex Cheeseman[edit]

Hello, Supernature91. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Alex Cheeseman, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Alex Cheeseman to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Piandcompany (talk) 12:50, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex Cheeseman for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Cheeseman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Cheeseman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Youreallycan 20:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 week for abusing multiple accounts (see User:86.163.104.169), as you did at List of sopranos in non-classical music. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 21:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Supernature91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Only trying to add information to list of sopranos in non-classical music, and put list of contraltos in non-classical music in order via alphabetical order of surname's first letter Supernature91 (talk) 11:31, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for the block.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 14:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for May 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alison Goldfrapp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ecstasy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lana Del Rey[edit]

Thank you for contributing to our article on Lana Del Rey. I would advise, however, to refrain from editing the genre section on the infobox without first reviewing and contributing to the conversation on that article's talk page about genres. So far, the provided sources only seem to label her genres as alternative, hip hop, and pop. Keep in mind that our personal opinions and beliefs about Ms. Grant's music are irrelevant; we can only add what we can prove with reliable sources. Right now, the inclusion of "alternative rock" and "hip hop" as genres is also strongly contested. 90% of reputable music journalism surrounding Del Rey's genre agree that it is pop music. Food for thought. Again, please do not edit that section without bringing sources that state otherwise to that talk page discussion. All future revisions made to that section will be construed as vandalism. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 06:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I see that you edited the genre section on the Lana Del Rey article again. We would definitely appreciate some sort of commentary from you on the talk page of that article in regards to your desired changes. I reverted what was added, on the grounds that you did not take your suggested revision to the talk page beforehand, as I asked in the message above. Also, I do not think the sources you provided are reliable. Pitchfork Media is an excellent music-related source, but the source does not say Del Rey's music, as a whole, falls under trip hop. It merely says that Born To Die has some trip hop beats, which is made clear on the article concerning that topic. I have also clarified this under the "Musical style and personae" section of the Lana Del Rey article, if you're interested. I have also removed indie pop as a genre. While it is 100% true that she creates indie pop music, the inclusion of Alternative rock covers this and other songs of her's that fall more squarely into the genre. In terms of biography articles, we aim for vaguer music genres to avoid over-categorizing artists and to prevent mile-long lists of every obscure sub-genre an artists has experimented with. I have, as with the trip hop scenario, made this clearer under the "Musical style and personae" section. If you would like to debate this further (and I strongly urge you to do so BEFORE making genre-related changes on this article), leave a message either on my talk page or on Lana's talk page. Thank you for your time and happy editing. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Third time's the charm, right? Please do not change the genres on Lana Del Rey without discussing it with me either here or on the talk page of that article (I linked to it multiple times above). Are you aware that Alternative music and alternative rock are the same thing? Are you also aware that indie pop is a sub-genre of alternative rock and that, on biography articles, we always go with the vaguer genre? We do this to avoid putting in long lists of sub-genres the artist probably only has one or two songs in. Again, we only add the most prominent genres. As far as trip hop goes: it's a pop music genre that combines hip hop and downtempo electronica, thus by adding links to alternative rock, hip hop, and pop, we're covering all the sub-genres her songs fall into, as well as covering ones that are closer to the pure genres like "Young and Beautiful" (sourced as alt. rock), "Video Games" (sourced as mainstream pop), and "National Anthem" (sourced as hip hop). Again, please do not ignore this message and continue to change the article without engaging us in dialogue. If you do, I'll have to report the edits as vandalism, which may lead to administrative action being taken against you. I want to avoid that and work through this obstacle with you, so that we can see eye-to-eye and understand why we both want the article our way. Thank you for understanding :) --Thevampireashlee (talk) 05:08, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]