User talk:Suplemental

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

June 2010[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Adam Kadmon. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TeapotgeorgeTalk 21:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Hammersoft. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

I am sorry I "attacked" a troll. I'm sure his feelings were hurt. --Suplemental (talk) 18:11, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:Suplemental. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC) are abusing your administrator privileges and I am reporting you for trolling. Good bye. --Suplemental (talk) 18:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
urm, he is not an admin. mono 18:27, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Woah, that's surprising. I thought he was a she. Thanks for the correction. --Suplemental (talk) 19:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Non-free images and userspace[edit]

Please do not place non-free images to userpages, as you did here. The use of non-free images on userpages is strictly prohibited by WP:NFCC #9. If you have questions, ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 23:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Reverting Hammersoft's edit[edit]

Hey, look, if you have a beef with Hammersoft, don't take it out in my subpage. Hammersoft was right to remove the image, I used it incorrectly. Besides, in general, you should never edit someone's userpage or subpages unless they specifically give you permission to, you're enforcing a policy as Hammersoft was, or you're reverting obvious vandalism. What you did was none of those three, so please refrain from doing it in the future. Fletch the Mighty (talk) 03:06, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


Unless you can be civil, please stay off of my talk page. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Polite advice (edit-conflict)[edit]

Wikipedia requires good manners in talking to other users. This edit doesn't seem to serve any purpose other than to be unkind. If you want to participating in the RfA, you are welcome to do so, where you can politely and specifically explain why you wouldn't support adminship for this person, but there's no reason to poke her on her talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

When I left a message on her talk page saying that she shouldn't be an admin and that it was a huge mistake - I was being honest and kind. Believe me... I wanted to use other words, but I refrained. --Suplemental (talk) 16:07, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I understand completely. If you really are a person who finds it absolutely impossible to refrain from saying the nasty thing, then Wikipedia probably isn't the best web site for you, because it's inevitable that you will be blocked over that aspect of your character. You're going to have to ask yourself the difficult question, "Would I rather change myself, or stop editing Wikipedia?" I'll check in on your contributions from time to time, when I think of it, to see which you've decided.-FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Stay off my talk page and leave me alone. --Suplemental (talk) 16:15, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
(ec with FisherQueen) That still isn't very appropriate. It's leaning toward a personal attack, even if you didn't mean it that way. Simply saying "This is a mistake" is not a very good argument, either. Instead, you should discuss why specifically you think it would be a poor idea. And for the record, VernoWhitney reverting some of your edits and warning you a couple of times does not necessarily make her RfA a bad idea. Also, FisherQueen is an administrator... so she has every right to warn and advise others. Fletch the Mighty (talk) 16:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I believe I am being very civil. I do not believe Verno would make a good administrator because I believe he shows a bias. If it is a personal attack to think someone won't make a good admin - then it is a sad day for wikipedia. Again, stay off my talk page. This is polite advice I am giving. There is nothing offensive or insulting at all here.
Yes, if he'd rather take some time to reflect, and not have any more advice right now, that's fine. I will not give any more advice on this talk pages, though I may give warnings and/or blocks if they become necessary if this user decides that Wikipedia's standards of civility are more than he or she can manage. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I told you to stay off my talk page FisherQueen, if this is more than you can handle - maybe wikipedia is not the place for you. I will be reporting you. Please, stay off my talk page. --Suplemental (talk) 16:27, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


This edit is a violation of Wikipedia's rules about civility. It is also incorrect; I was easily able to find the sockpuppet investigation you mentioned, which resulted in the finding that that user hadn't broken any rules. Please remember that Wikipedia's rules require you to interact politely with all other users, even when you disagree with them. Notice that your comment had no connection to the subject under discussion, which was whether or not a specific article should be deleted. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:28, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Mentioning that someone had been investigated for sock puppetry is not against any rule. Get your facts straight. --Suplemental (talk) 15:54, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
In this context, the rule you have broken is WP:CIVIL. Because good manners are essential in a project which works by collaboration, users who repeatedly refuse to get along with others politely are frequently blocked. I want to make sure that you understand the rule that you've broken, and the potential consequences, because I'd hate for you simply to be confusing Wikipedia's rules with those of some other web sites, where bad manners are more usual. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)