User talk:Supremeeditor1

supremeeditor1: Hello!

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Supremeeditor1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Boastlilt1". The reason given for Boastlilt1's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Drmies (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Considering your appeal is 3 minutes after the other account's appeal for unblocking, I am inclined to believe the auto block is acting exactly as desired. only (talk) 04:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Supremeeditor1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Boastlilt1". The reason given for Boastlilt1's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Drmies (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: User deserves this block even if they're not related to the other editor. Drmies (talk) 03:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Only, I have declined the unblock request and placed a separate block on the account just to make matters clear. Their contributions are enough reason, but there's also their deleted contributions. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Supremeeditor1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OMG My account had been hacked and the hacker used my account to do all of this What do I do!?

Decline reason:

"Stop lying" would be a good first step. Huon (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Supremeeditor1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for the things I did and will not do them ever again. I would love to continue editing Wikipedia with good intention

Decline reason:

We could use the Standard Offer approach in this case. In this context, you should make a new appeal in 6 months time. PhilKnight (talk) 20:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Supremeeditor1 (talk) 23:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain, in your own words, what the "things" you did are and what you will do instead if unblocked. only (talk) 23:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC) Well I changed some pages with no good intention just to experiment and I will use the sandbox if unblocked, also I will contribute my knowledge to wikipedia not deprive others of wikipedia's useful information. Supremeeditor1 (talk) 01:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will appeal again in six months. Supremeeditor1 (talk) 02:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]