User talk:Tagirem

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Manipal concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Manipal, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Manipal

Hello Tagirem. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Manipal".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Manipal}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —rybec 11:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of French Books on India

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Tagirem (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on French Books on India, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 18:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Tagirem. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.Deb (talk) 22:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RA0808 ^talk _contribs and Deb (talk), I would like to request the recovering of the contribution "French Books on India" on Wikipedia. Regarding the supposed conflict of interest, I declare that I am not co-ordinator of the project and I do not receive any economic profit for editing the article on Wikipedia. I know the project and its contribution to digital culture. It is a grass-roots international WIKI-style project, not a project by one person or group in one place. The project promotes the common good, by offering community heritage groups a multilingual platform that combines browsing and reading and that presents the encounter between two major world cultures: French and Indian. I would like also to highlight the quality and innovation of the project, which is continuously developing and has upto 1260 views a month from 50 countries. There is no other project with similar coverage and methodology. I am not advertising or promoting my own role, but presenting the project and its volunteers, who do the work for free. For all these reasons, I consider the contribution should be on Wikipedia and I request to retrieve its deleted content. Tagirem (talk) 13:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I can restore the article but it will remain in your user space until it is ready for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You need to ensure that you are familiar with the guidelines, including notability, verifiability and neutral point of view. Deb (talk) 15:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's now here.Deb (talk) 15:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was unwise of you to move this back to article space without further discussion. It is back in user space. Please don't move it out again unless you are sure it meets the guidelines. You can seek help at the Teahouse. Deb (talk) 07:37, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]