User talk:Tarylem

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tarylem! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 18:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you that you noticed, I wrote something. Hope my contribution will be helpful, someday. The Nagorny Karabach's Armenian heritage will be probably cleared by Azeri. Same with the case of JW case in Russia - they and their heritage will be cleared by the local terrorist government. I hope I will be able to describe it before it is destroyed. Unfortunately, there are a lot of similar cases around the world. --Tarylem (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well I did notice. I started Persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia so I like to keep an eye on future changes. I'm always happy to see people making good faith edits, especially newbies. :) It can be hard to do things by yourself and two heads are better than one. I'm always procastinating all the stuff I wish to do around here. Wikipedia can be somewhat maze-like so if there's ever anything you need help with, please do feel free to ask me. Even if you just want ideas on stuff you could edit that aligns with your interests, don't hesistate to reach out. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, I have some questions: I found some cases of ECHR about Jehovah's Witness and added them to the articles, so I thought similarly about other new religions... and I hit a wall in the case of the Unification Church. From some kind of repetitive "unwillingness" to help with publishing what I wrote (as the article is somehow locked for newbies), through remarks such as "unless the source says it is a persecution, we cannot call it persecution" regardless of the persecution is self-evident, or "overuse of primary sources" arguments, to open hostility appeared in the discussion and I honestly do not know, how to handle it. Can you give me some advice? Tarylem (talk) 16:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like you're in the midst of some kind of content dispute? It can be a bit difficult to give specific advice without further context but generally, primary sources are best avoided and synthesis as well. Are you using the talk page to communicate with the other editor about your concerns? Apologies if this isn't that helpful, I can try to be clearer if you find this confusing. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warning of a maze thing... I'm not scared. But thank in advance you for your help. Tarylem (talk) 20:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]