User talk:TastyBreadToast

Welcome!

Hello, TastyBreadToast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Yahwism did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Doug Weller talk 18:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nephilim, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 18:11, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Your edit to Subordinationism has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 16:51, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Short descriptions

Please note that short descriptions should be short. The standard is no more than 40 chars. Skyerise (talk) 10:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

The Beast

I find your edits problematic and have reverted them.

1. You changed the number of beasts from 3 to 4 without providing any reliable third-party sources.
2. You created two sections with the very same title "Beast from the Earth" making different claims based on different chapters of Revelation, with the new section totally without any citations at all.

Please note that when you make changes or additions to an article, you must provide an analytical source that supports the changes. What you may not do is use the Book of Revelation for a source for which you provide your own interpretations or ideas. You may summarize interpretations published in reliable 3rd party sources. Unless you provide such sources, your additions and changes will be reverted. See our verifiability policy. Also see WP:PSTS for the difference between primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. In general, sources should be secondary, not primary or tertiary. Skyerise (talk) 22:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

In my defense, the only sources you'll get that there are, in reality, only three beasts in the Book of Revelation are interpretations. Most interpretations conflate the identity of the beast mentioned in chapter 11 with either the first beast of chapter 13 or the scarlet beast in chapter 17. I myself do conflate them, but ultimately, whether this beast is either one of the other two beasts is a matter of interpretation. A Bible literalist could interpret the chapter 11 beast as being distinct from the first one from chapter 13 merely because they view the book as having a linear sequence and therefore interpret them as distinct because "oh, this beast appears before this one so it must be distinct." I might not have cited a source. Fair. But it doesn't have to take a source to allow for the possibility of one not conflating the identities of this beast with other beasts, and thus, it is best to leave it as a matter of personal interpretation. TastyBreadToast (talk) 14:29, 27 April 2024 (UTC)