User talk:Taviyamato

Welcome!

Hello, Taviyamato, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Xtrem pc magazine, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 19:16, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Xtrem pc magazine

A tag has been placed on Xtrem pc magazine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 19:16, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Antiziganism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Antiziganism was changed by Taviyamato (u) (t) deleting 44402 characters on 2010-08-27T07:41:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Antiziganism. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:45, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not vandalism, but you should be discussed in public and made you respond to your edits, and have them argued against by everybody unanomously. I don't support reverts because only discussion is democracy. But I have reverted your bullshit right now, because I wanted to read the real text. Teemu Ruskeepää (talk) 10:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TaviYamato wrote on my Youtube page on 21.9.2010

TaviYamato (hace 1 día) (Pendiente de aprobación) Aprobar | Suprimir | Bloquear usuario | Spam Marcado como spam shut the fuck up with your comments on wikipedia , leave my articles alone and STFU stay out of wikipedia and write only about your country

Teemu Ruskeepää (talk) 05:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [2] [3] [4] Looks like vandalism to me. This should've got a high level warning like this:

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Antiziganism, you may be blocked from editing. . 82.152.214.154 (talk) 15:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]