User talk:Tawkerbot4/Aug06

Hi - there seem to be no user page warnings associated with reversions :-(

Hi - recently this absolutely fantastic bot reverted some foolish vandalism of the Ned Kelly article. It didn't add a warning to the user page though, and looking at recent contributions it doesn't always leave messages. Why not? Messages warning users are really helpful, not just for letting the users know their behaviour is not OK. For example, I often watch the talk pages of anon IPs I have previously warned and know that they possibly need to be blocked. Regards (with catnip) --A Y Arktos\^talk 00:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has the odd problem, usually it warns but on occasion it needs a reset before it warns again -- Tawker 19:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tawkerbot4 reverted my edit and restored vandalism

Hello, Tawker. This is just to inform you that the Tawkerbot4 reverted my edit in List of neighborhood listings by city and restored some AOL vandalism. The difference is here. Thanks. --Tachikom a 00:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Vandalism?

This is an anti-vandal bot? I'd hate to see a VandalBot... Fredil Yupigo 00:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, it was the tag team issue / combined w/ a bit of bot downtime, the bot isn't perfect you know :o -- Tawker 00:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tawkerbot reverting replacement of speedy tags

All the Tawkerbots seem to have a problem with users rolling back pages to replace speedy tags that were removed. It probably detects nonsense in the reversion of the page and recognizes it as vandalism. I'm not sure if anything can be done about this, but just a heads up. --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 20:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, can you give a diff, it shouldn't revert that -- Tawker 00:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gorp

Please do not revert this page again. After careful deliberation on the discussion page, it was unamiously decided that the page should be redirected to Trail Mix. Almighty Rajah 20:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby

Hello. Tawkerbot4 reverted this edit [1] which is a quote and thus entirely appropriate per WP:Profanity. I understand, of course, why Tawkerbot4 reverted, but since the article now falls foul of policy i would like to change it back. However, i don't want to get into a revert war with a bot, thus could you advise how i can make the edit without attracting Tawkerbot4's attention? Thanks.Rockpocket 05:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion question

Hiya, I was wondering if you could review an edit that you accomplished a few weeks ago? [2]. It looks like there was a hoax article created, and then an anonymous IP attempted to come in and remove the false information, but then you reverted the edit, putting the false information back into the article. Did you have any information at the time which made you think that the information was true? Or was it just a case of automatically reverting what looked like simple vandalism? More info about the situation is at Talk:University of Adelaide#Possible hoax. --Elonka 17:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James Kitching

Thank you for restoring the above page, but I am withdrawing my contribution until I have found out why Mets501 has vandalised the page by deleting the images that go with it. Paul venter 17:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect revert

Ok, this is annoying... Cleaning up the deletion-sorting queue, I was first reverted by User:AntiVandalBot and now by Tawkerbot4. I can understand the need to fight vandalism, but this seems to be getting a little out of hand. You would think that there would be some check for situations where the "vandal" created the page more than a year ago and has made 90% of all edits to it. By the way, here is the diff for my reverted edit:[3] and this is the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Ready. -- Visviva 19:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cristobal Colon

Why writing Kristupas Kolumbas, there isn't a redirect to Christopher Columbus?

down boy

Your bot is restoring copyvio'd content to an article, I thought standard practice was to blank and tag copyvios, until somone gets around to deleting them--152.163.100.68 14:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Singshot

Please stop autoreverting my proper edits to Singshot 69.232.200.17 15:20, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cardigan Mountain School

Article reads like school brochure. Offers no valid points without reference. Needs to be deleted.

68.108.42.23

complaint

It reverted my legitimate edits --Speedystickd 18:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]