User talk:TeaLover1996/Archive 12
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Adding page protection plates
I notice you have again added a semi protection plate to Flo Rida can you point me to where this was protected by an admin? There is no mention here [[1]] Theroadislong (talk) 13:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Theroadislong: [2] says it's semi-protected from 2 Feb 2015 until 2 Feb 2016 due to "Persistent vandalism: + extensive protection history". Joseph2302 (talk) 13:14, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. Why doesn't the article say that it is semi protected then I wonder?Theroadislong (talk) 13:20, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- I expect if an Admin had wanted little padlocks all over the shop then an Admin would have so placed them
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ahh I see now that a padlock appears on the right hand side...OK thanks all. Theroadislong (talk) 13:27, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- The padlock that wasn't added by an admin you mean...? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:33, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- But still not clear to me why a relatively new user would be editing in this obscure manner? Theroadislong (talk) 13:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Theroadislong and Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: It isn't obscure, anyone can add padlocks to articles TeaLover1996 Talk to me ☏ 13:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think the obscurity comes from wondering why anyone would want to. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:41, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Theroadislong and Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: It isn't obscure, anyone can add padlocks to articles TeaLover1996 Talk to me ☏ 13:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ahh I see now that a padlock appears on the right hand side...OK thanks all. Theroadislong (talk) 13:27, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- I expect if an Admin had wanted little padlocks all over the shop then an Admin would have so placed them
- Thank you. Why doesn't the article say that it is semi protected then I wonder?Theroadislong (talk) 13:20, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
MOS reverts
Regarding this and this revert, it looks like the editors were correctly fixing formatting per our Manual of Style. For the former, you asked for a source when information wasn't changed, and for the latter, you left a message for the editor to provide a reliable source for their edit, though they had simply changed the dashes. Just wanted to give a heads up that I've restored both edits and to be careful when reverting. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 15:40, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I've got a question for ya
Hi TeaLover, I have a sport related question on the the beautiful game. If Manchester United stayed in the BPL and Middlesbrough F.C. got promoted in the BPL too, who would you support. And you have to choose one club! Jamie Welford (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Jamie Welford: Hmm, tough question, I have supported Manchester United for significantly longer than I have Middlesbrough, if Boro did get promoted I would support both, however as like you said if I could only choose one team, it would be Middlesbrough who would just edge it as I live there. Feel free to ask any more questions, I cannot promise that I will answer them, but I will try to when I have the time. Thanks and happy editing. TeaLover1996 Talk to me ☏ 18:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- They won't be asking anymore, they've been blocked as a sockpuppet. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Joseph2302: Oh, I didn't realise it was a sock. @GiantSnowman: I'm guessing that is why you reverted the edit. TeaLover1996 Talk to me ☏ 18:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- It probably was- a standard thing to do is just rollback every edit a sockpuppet made. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Joseph2302: Oh, I didn't realise it was a sock. @GiantSnowman: I'm guessing that is why you reverted the edit. TeaLover1996 Talk to me ☏ 18:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- They won't be asking anymore, they've been blocked as a sockpuppet. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes, WP:DENY. GiantSnowman 18:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Funny enough, he isn't mentioned at the SPI page? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:30, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Novak Djokovic - Grand Slam Statistics
Would you please leave my edit for his grand slam record at the French Open. His win loss record there is 48-11. His total grand slam record for all majors is 193-34. Australian Open (50-6) French Open (48-11) 81.36% NOT 49-11 81.67% as it keeps getting reverted back to! Wimbledon (45-8) US Open (50-9)
As I previously stated - during the 2011 French Open, he received a walkover from Fabio Fognini at the quarter final stage, which does not count as a win. Therefore his records yearly at this tournament are as follows: 2015: 6-1 (Finalist) 2014: 6-1 (Finalist) 2013: 5-1 (Semifinal) 2012: 6-1 (Finalist) 2011: 4-1 (Semifinal - received walkover which does not count as a win, as no match was played, via Fognini in QF) 2010: 4-1 (Quarterfinal) 2009: 2-1 (Third Round) 2008: 5-1 (Semifinal) 2007: 5-1 (Semifinal) 2006: 4-1 (Quarterfinal) 2005: 1-1 (2nd Round)
Total: 48-11
If you hadn't noticed, his career grand slam record is 193-34, which can be found on the ATP's official website. [1]
I'm having trouble loading the ATP website, but I will send you another link that will show you his record from the 2011 French Open whenever it is working properly for me, as apparently the Wikipedia page for that specific tournament isn't sufficient enough.
99.192.71.248 (talk) 18:46, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Brent