User talk:Tejas pratihar

August 2024

Hello, I'm HistoryofIran. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zagros Mountains, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:14, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brother, I am sorry for not providing the source, but I have taken out the reports of Gurjar DNA, they prove that the Gurjar tribe was from the Zagros Hills of Iran. I want to save this edit back. If you support me with the source, I will be grateful to you. Tejas pratihar (talk) 16:43, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jograj Singh Gurjar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jograj Singh Gurjar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and Highly POV, ludicrus claims made in Wikipedia's voice (45 beyonet wounds) - this is stuff from legends, not from WP:HISTRS sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ravensfire (talk) 18:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okk I will publish this next time with more sources and proper edit Tejas pratihar (talk) 18:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please wait for a reviewer to approve the article. Besides just good sources (please read WP:HISTRS!), there's way too much POV language in the article. Great for a website promoting his culture, but bad for an encyclopedia. Ravensfire (talk) 22:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same with Vijay Singh Gujjar‎. You really need to start that as a draft at Draft:Vijay Singh Gujjar‎ and work with a reviewer. As it was written, there's no chance it would have gotten past a WP:AFD - sources need to have significant coverage, and what was there was small mentions in passing. And please don't repeat legends as facts in Wikipedia's voice, that's just not helpful. Sources should be from reputable scholars. Ravensfire (talk) 22:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello I recently noticed your revision on Panwar Gurjars which clearly looked like a Sock version reverted earlier and also POV push. If that was a mistake, worry not your changes have been reverted. If you think i made a mistake, you can reach me on my talk page. Vedant Katyayan (talk) 18:59, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vedant Katyayan: See [1]. Ratnahastin (talk) 00:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

पामर,पवार गुर्जर क्लैन है वो उसे राजपूत क्लैन से कसे रीडायरेक्ट क्रिडिया? या तो वह पर राजपूत के साथ गुर्जर लिखा हो तो कुछ मान सकते है मैं पहले भी देख चुका हूँ तूने गुर्जर पेजेज ख़राब किए है ऐसा क्यों ? Tejas pratihar (talk) 01:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:SOCK and Block Evasion which is what you are doing. You need to address the reason you were blocked ON YOUR MAIN ACCOUNT, and work towards getting unblocked. That WILL NOT happen quickly, and you may need to ask for the standard offer which requires 6 months of NO EDITS with an account or an IP here. That just starts a conversation and does not in any way guarantee you will be unblocked. If you continue to evade the block, your edits will continue to be reverted and your pages deleted on sight. Think on it. Be a disruptive block evading sock, or try to be responsible and get unblocked knowing that's a tough path to take, but it's been done before. Ravensfire (talk) 04:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Anujror per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anujror. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 02:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I accept that I have made mistakes, but I did not have many accounts. There was a conspiracy to block me through some accounts for a long time. I just request you to give me a chance. I will work with all my heart and soul by following the rules of Wikipedia. I will neither make any wrong choices nor make any wrong edits. Please give me a chance. I will be grateful to you. I just want a chance from you, Admin Sir.}} Tejas pratihar (talk) 17:31, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I accept that I have made mistakes, but I did not have many accounts. There was a conspiracy to block me through some accounts for a long time. I just request you to give me a chance. I will work with all my heart and soul by following the rules of Wikipedia. I will neither make any wrong choices nor make any wrong edits. Please give me a chance. I will be grateful to you. I just want a chance from you, Admin Sir.}} Tejas pratihar (talk) 17:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 02:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tejas pratihar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept all my mistakes! But for a long time some accounts were making strategies to block me. They used to trap me by spoiling the pages made by me and forcing me to fix them so that they could report me. They also put mental pressure on me by spoiling the pages made by me. But now I have got some courage to tell my story to you. I apologize to you for all my mistakes and promise that from now on I will edit according to the rules of Wikipedia. Just give me one chance, I will be grateful to you. Just give me one chance.

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please; you abusively had two. Confirmed to Chroniclesind, Vishanti Rawal, Daksh Chauhan Gurjar. Good block. Yamla (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.