User talk:Tell no lie

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not add unreferenced negative information to biographies of living persons, as you did to Reuben Singh. Thank you. FreplySpang 22:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not do a wholesale revert of that sort before appropriate discussion on the talk page. Many of the passages you restored are clearly inappropriate regardless of whether they are true. We do indeed strive for accuracy, but accuracy isn't enough; material like this must be encyclopedic in tone and presentation. JamesMLane t c 09:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the talk page.

If you have a problem with the way an article such as Reuben Singh is worded, please go to the article's talk page and specifically point out what you think is incorrect about it. Please do not wholesale revert to old versions of the article that serve mearly to attack their subject. Thank you. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)} 21:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the talk page (part 2)

Please do not make wholesale reverts without first starting a discussion on the talk page. Also, please listen to friendly advice now given to you by four different editors. If you continue vandalizing that page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pascal.Tesson 20:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because you've ignored the friendly advice....

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Reuben Singh, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesMLane t c 02:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent Vandal

This user consistently re-vandalises the page Reuben Singh despite numerous warnings. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.10.34.44 (talk) 16:21, 31 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Reuben Singh, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.34.44 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 31 December 2006

PLEASED TO SEE THE TRUTH STATED ABOUT REUBEN SINGH

Though it does not need to be highligthed in bold as it makes it difficult to read. Wikipedia is about quality reference facts & material backed by sound references which in all fairness tellnolie provides.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.18.25.3 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 5 January 2007

Not pleased to see a good article vandalised

If tellnolie has some genuine, cited, impartial facts to add about Reuben Singh, he should edit it according to Wikipedias guidelines and not just make wholesale reverts that not only make uncited accusations against Mr Singh but also ruin the work others have put into this article.

The version not touched by tellnolie paints a pretty dim picture of Reuben Singh as it is. I do not see why he seeks to revert it back to the over the top vandalised version.

Wikipedia should not become a soapbox for your own grievances! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.10.41.13 (talk) 14:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Blocked

This user might have been able to help improve the article if s/he had been willing to engage in collaborative editing. As it is, however, his or her pattern of abusive behavior has resulted in an indefinite block. JamesMLane t c 16:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]