User talk:The3Kittens

July 2020

Hello, I'm Davey2010. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chutti TV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 12:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chutti TV, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 12:58, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chutti TV; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Also, please don't tell other editors not to edit an article, as you did in an edit summary here. You do not own any article, and do not have the right to decide who may edit an article. JBW (talk) 14:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Chutti TV shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. –Davey2010^Talk 14:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the fourth time - Please wp:source each and individual show, The next time you add the content without adequate sources you'll be taken to WP:AN3 and you could be blocked, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 14:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I will never make legal threats anymore. The3Kittens (talk) 07:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me from editing. I will only edit my userpage, my userpage's talkpage and correct errors. The3Kittens (talk) 11:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. –Davey2010^Talk 12:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I will never make legal threats anymore. The3Kittens (talk) 07:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I will never make legal threats anymore. Unblock me from editing. The3Kittens (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Sorry, I will never make legal threats anymore. Every time I edit on Wikipedia, it gets reverted. I will only edit my own fandom wiki called "The Three Kittens Wiki". The3Kittens (talk) 07:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, You finally accepted the rules The3Kittens (talk) 07:16, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The3Kittens (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will never make legal threats anymore. Unblock me.

Decline reason:

To be unblocked, you will need to explicitly withdraw the legal threats you have already made. As you indicate you aren't going to edit any further, there is no need to lift the block. 331dot (talk) 08:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another point: Although the blocking administrator chose to give only the legal threat as the reason for the block, there are other issues which need to be settled, the most obvious one being edit-warring. You were warned about edit-warring but carried on doing it. I would not even consider unblocking unless you make it clear that you won't be edit-warring again. There's also the dishonesty of pretending to be writing on behalf of the companies you claimed would sue. You need to guarantee you won't tell such lies again. (The fact that they were totally childish lies that nobody was likely to believe doesn't make much difference.) If you make another unblock request you need to deal with those matters as well as the silly fake legal threat. JBW (talk) 08:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

== Unblock request ==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The3Kittens (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I will never vandalize Wikipedia. I will only edit my own userpage, my userpage's talk page and correct grammatical errors.

Decline reason:

If you're only planning to edit in userspace, there's no reason to unblock you - Wikipedia isn't social media or a free webhost, and you still haven't explicitly withdrawn the legal threat, nor hae you addressed JBW's comments above. Acroterion (talk) 12:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The3Kittens (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

RickinBaltimore, please unblock me. Allow me to only edit my userpage, talkpage and I will also correct grammatical errors and mistakes. The3Kittens (talk) 12:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not addressed why you made a legal threat, or that you understand or policies on legal threats. You also have been edit warring, which you have not addressed. Unblocking you to simply edit your userpage and talkpage makes no sense either, as then you can't be constructive. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

instead.

You still have not addressed the biggest issue, that is the legal threats you made that led to the block. Also, if you are looking to just edit on your user and talk page, as it was said above, we are not social media. To any admin reviewing the unblock, I do not feel this editor currently has the maturity or competence to warrant an unblock at this time. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:10, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will only edit my userpage, my talkpage and I will also correct mistakes. Please remove me from the list of blocked users and IP addresses. The3Kittens (talk) 06:56, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request 5

RickinBaltimore, I am blocked from editing because of legal threats. I will withdraw the threats I made.

Another reason is I was edit-warring with Davey2010. I understand that Wikipedia is not social media etc. not type any childish lies anymore.

Expiry set

RickinBaltimore, please create an expiry set. As I mentioned earlier, I will never do such crimes anymore. I want to become unblocked. The3Kittens (talk) 06:04, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Things to do after unblocked

Davey2010, I will never do such crimes anymore. I will only edit my userpage, my talkpage and correct errors and mistakes. Please unblock me. After I am unblocked. Please source each and every network/programme with the help of geniuses. The3Kittens (talk) 06:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

RickinBaltimore, please unblock me! You said that your IP address was recently used by The3Kittens. I mistakenly typed that If the content in Chutti TV was removed, then companies would sue people who have done them. You blocked me from editing. I will never make legal threats anymore. Please create an expiry set. I want to correct mistakes in Wikipedia. The3Kittens (talk) 06:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct! I will tell RickinBaltimore and Chetsford to unblock you! TSMWCfan1 (talk) 15:00, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The3Kittens (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

RickinBaltimore, I accidentally vandalized the Chutti TV article. That caused you to block my account. There are good reasons for me to become unblocked. One is correcting misspellings in articles. We can correct any misspellings in articles. Another is correcting mistakes and errors in articles. If there's any link problems in Wikipedia, We can correct it. The3Kittens (talk) 15:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request is declined due to violation of our policy on WP:SHAREDACCOUNTs you committed while filing it (i.e. "We can correct any misspellings in articles. Another is correcting mistakes and errors in articles. If there's any link problems in Wikipedia, We can correct it."). At this point, I regret to inform you that your Talk page access has also been revoked since your unblock requests have become disruptive. While you are no longer able to edit Wikipedia, you should feel free to continue participating in the Wikipedia project as a non-editing reader. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chetsford (talk) 06:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Chetsford (talk) 06:12, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure that The3Kittens will accept Wikipedia policies. It will never make distruptive edits. First, unblock TSMWCfan and TSMWCfan1, then unblock The3Kittens' underlying IP address. Then, unblock The3Kittens' talkpage. Then unblock The3Kittens as a whole. TSMWCFan2 (talk) 08:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above are from block-evading sockpuppets of this blocked user and should be held against any future unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 11:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account now also has violated WP:3X, and is hereforth banned from Wikipedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 11:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user petitioned to the community for an unblock. The unblock was rejected and the community ban was endorsed. See this diff. Note that the user engaged in WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE in an attempt to swing the vote but was unsuccessful. --Yamla (talk) 18:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this community discussion closed on 2020-07-26. Six months from this date is 2021-01-26, assuming this user refrains from all further sockpuppetry and ban evasion from now on. --Yamla (talk) 18:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The soonest they can request unbanning is currently 2021-02-25. Until then, all requests should be dismissed without review. --Yamla (talk) 10:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, further block evasion today: TSMWCfanboy4 (talk · contribs).

Salvio

09:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More block evasion: Redring12345 (talk · contribs).

Salvio

11:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget about TSMWCfanboy5 (talk · contribs)....T^{fess up?}_{or down?} 14:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeap. No need to catalogue them, we catch them in Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of The3Kittens and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of The3Kittens. I expect this banned user will create a lot more before giving up, but we'll catch them, throw away any contributions, and block them. --Yamla (talk) 15:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More evasion on 2021-02-25. --Yamla (talk) 14:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User is no longer eligible to request unblocking until 2021-09-22. Any further evasion or misuse of UTRS in that time will reset the timer. --Yamla (talk) 10:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]