User talk:TheCarefulReader

Welcome![edit]

Hello, TheCarefulReader, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! South Nashua (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Or Intercollegiate journal[edit]

The article Or Intercollegiate journal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of any notability. WP:TOOSOON.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 06:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Adam Rubenstein) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Adam Rubenstein.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article is right on the borderline of meeting notability guidelines. Virtually all significant coverage of the subject in independent sources (not to be confused with coverage by the subject) is about their coverage of Steve King, a single incident that says almost nothing about Rubenstein beyond the fact that they're a reporter. However, I came across a few other articles online in reliable sources writing about Rubenstein favorably, if not at length, as part of post-mortems of the Weekly Standard, so I'm inclined to let this through with a notability tag. I would recommend, however, that you try to find more coverage of Rubenstein in reliable sources that discusses Rubenstein beyond their altercation with King.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

@Rosguill: Hi there. Added further example and citation of Rubenstein's work in Vanity Fair. Their review and profile of Charlie Kirk achieved some notoriety, beyond their altercation with King.

TheCarefulReader (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]