User talk:TheEditorUK2015

Hello. If you restore that profanity again, I'll block you from editing. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't restore the profanity. I removed the bold. It's not necessarily intended that way.TheEditorUK2015 (talk) 21:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The text has no other meaning. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheEditorUK2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I acted in good faith. I removed the BOLD from the letters, making it what appeared to me to be a reasoned albeit stilted argument to kindly ask someone not to edit if they aren't knowledgeable on the topic. However I can see your point to and will not make any further attempt to re-add the text. TheEditorUK2015 (talk) 21:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your edit was clearly intended to be disruptive. only (talk) 22:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's not true. I also saw your message on my talk page after I reverted it. TheEditorUK2015 (talk) 22:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TheEditorUK2015 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not intend to be distruptive TheEditorUK2015 (talk) 22:20, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Accept reason:

You are now unblocked, but please try to remember that a calm and easy-going approach is pretty much always the road to success here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]