User talk:TheGreatEagle92
Appearance
This is TheGreatEagle92's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
References
[edit]![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
This may sound like a useless question, but is College Football Reference a good reference for college football stats, or is it slightly inaccurate? I was planning on using it. TheGreatEagle92 (talk) 02:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- It's not a useless question. It's true that sports-reference.com is often cited on Wikipedia but I have not seen any discussions in the reliable sources noticeboard archives that specifically address whether it can be considered a reliable source. There was some hint that some of these so-called reference sites were getting their data from Wikipedia, so that would be a definite problem.
- You should ask questions like this, with appropriate context, at WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Most of the time, judgement about reliability needs context - what facts are being supported, why is this site better than other possibilities, why is this the only site where the information is found? — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:40, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
wikimedia.org with your username and appeal.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en![@](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/88/At_sign.svg/15px-At_sign.svg.png)
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.