User talk:ThePrussiaCaesar

July 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Junkers Ju 287 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Junkers Ju 287 was changed by ThePrussiaCaesar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859365 on 2020-07-02T18:58:15+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Junkers Ju 287, you may be blocked from editing. Nyook ^✉ 19:00, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Junkers Ju 287. Nyook ^✉ 19:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThePrussiaCaesar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im a new user that didnt know much ThePrussiaCaesar (talk) 11:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't have to know much about Wikipedia to know that your edits were inappropriate. In order to be unblocked, you will need to describe what edits you wish to make and convince another administrator that you understand what you did wrong and will not do it again. As this request does not do those things, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 11:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.