User talk:Theahamay

Welcome!

Hello, Theahamay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:06, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to NASCAR rules and regulations, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to NASCAR rules and regulations. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:06, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to NASCAR rules and regulations with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ///EuroCarGT 00:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:EuroCarGT, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. —C.Fred (talk) 00:19, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theahamay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

nothing I have added has be incorrect, I have demanded actual sources from provided info, my information is not only sourced; it's backed by popular opinion. I was threatened to be block, and now I'm asking Lugia2453and C.Fred and User talk:EuroCarGT be also blocked for continuing to provide false information.Theahamay (talk) 00:48, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for edit warring; you'll need to address that if you wish to be unblocked before the 24 hours expires. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 02:51, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{again, I have not edited anything unfairly. It was claimed I attacked someone, I did not. It was claimed I was adding my opinion, I added popular belief and sourced the information. Everything I edited it hearsay because it is not sourced. They stated if I simply deleted it then that would have been ok, I did that and added the exact same info they had earlier on the page. I would like them banned for the real edit issues, for not giving proper cause to change my cited edits.}}

You're not blocked for the content of your edits, so discussing them is irrelevant. You are blocked for edit warring, which the Wikipedia community simply does not tolerate. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 04:20, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{so again, I simply edited as I saw need. When the first removal was posted, I instructed the users of why not only was my edit valid, but I called into question his validity to change it. He then obviously complained. I followed the guidelines, and if I was banned those others must be as well.}}