User talk:Theclub249

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

October 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 20:27, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ale_Jrb ^talk 20:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theclub249 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read everything and I totally understand now. I'm so sorry and I won't ever put a spam link again.

Decline reason:

I'd believe you if it weren't for the fact you evaded your block with Curvynation (talk · contribs). — Blueboy 96 19:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theclub249 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not sure why it was considered spamming. I am so sorry, I didn't know it was against the rules to post my website in a category where it might fit. I know better now, and it won't happen again. Can you please tell me why other's are allowed to post there's there and I am not? I'm just not familiar with it. It's my first time here. And, I'm sorry, but I don't know what a sockpuppet is. Can you please tell me? And, this is not an advertising account. I promise you. I am just someone trying to get used to Wikipedia and thought I would just start small and post a link to my site. I was going to add a page, but I tried to do something small first. I sincerely didn't know it was not allowed because I saw other links there to other BBW Nightclubs too, so I thought it would be ok for me to put it there too. Is is ok to post a page about us? And, what can I do to lift the block? I promise that I will not "spam" again, although I'm not sure what you all calling spamming because it was just a link to my site. Anyway, thanks for listening and please let me know.

Decline reason:

See our policies on external links, spamming and conflict of interest. They explain this. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theclub249 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Curvynation is my sister, that is not me. I'm not sure what she did or if she did anything. I asure you that I will speak to her and make sure whatever she does is with her and does not involve me at all. I will also ask her to delete her account or should I just delete this one? I'm sorry to put this on here like this, but I tried to see if it was a way to respond to you personally, but I could not find one. If it's the wrong way, I'm sorry. But, I can assure you, it was a mistake and will not happen again.

Decline reason:

Curvynation (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) created the same spam links as you did. The story that this account is your sister is not credible. Also, there are no productive edits from either of your accounts. — Sandstein 07:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.