User talk:Thlgnosis

You removed the WP:COI template from your article The_social-analytical_perspective

Your contributions to Wikipedia are very helpful, but to guarantee the quality of the Encyclopedia, editors need to follow guidelines, one of which is WP:COI. Please familiarise yourself with that guideline before editing or creating more articles. Also, please do not remove templates from articles without addressing the problem(s) they bring to attention. If you disagree with the template being added to your article, there is a discussion on the talkpages of the articles in question at Talk:The_social-analytical_perspective where you can provide your comments on the matter. You do not need to defend your new articles but it would be helpful if you would clarify your relationship with the articles' subject. Thank you 193.244.33.47 (talk) 14:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Research Centre GNOSIS‎

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Research Centre GNOSIS‎, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Howie ☎ 08:44, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for discussion

Hi there - A discussion regarding several articles you have written has come up at the WP:COI. It would help if you could join in the discussion there, and verify your interest in relation to your articles and state what connection you have with the subject matter. If you decide not to participate, then it may be assumed that you have a conflict of interest and this could lead to problems when it comes to editing. Please click on the following link and join in the discussion: [1] Thanks Howie ☎ 09:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HowardBerry (talk • contribs)

Consider userfying your three articles

Hello Thlgnosis. Over at WP:COIN there is still a discussion of Lars-Henrik Schmidt, Social Analytics and Research Centre GNOSIS. In their present form, these articles might wind up getting deleted through our usual processes, since they lack citations of reliable sources that have commented on those topics. Rather than go through the tedium of a deletion process, maybe you would consider allowing these three articles to be moved to your user space. For instance, Social Analytics would be moved to User:Thlgnosis/Social Analytics. You could then do further work on them to establish the notability of these topics, and not run any risk of deletion. Let me know if you would consider this. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]