User talk:Thodef

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Thodef, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! œ ^™ 03:52, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page The Disclosure Project has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Coldplay Expert 10:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protocols of the Elders of Zion

File:1934 299p. PSM - Patriotic Publishing Co..png

You're wrong about the year of first publication. It was 1903, not 1901.
There are several spellings - transliterations of the Russian - of Nilus' first name. However, the most common English language translation is "Serge." Since this is the English language Encyclopedia, we've selected the latter. --Ludvikus (talk) 11:09, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck to you, and Welcome to Wikipedia. --Ludvikus (talk) 11:09, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The two (2) PSM texts you found are not First editions by the original tertiary editors. You should be extremely careful - because these texts are often 7th editions of originals which have been edited several times by anonymous editors, or unreliable editors. I left two (2) detailed responses on the Talk page of the articles. Don't believe that you have a book you're looking for just because of its title. You'll be surprised if you look very, very, closely, how sneaky the publishers are. --Ludvikus (talk) 21:31, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've REVERTED your out-of-sequence remarks which distort my meaning. ALWAYS put your new comments BELOW. Otherwise you make my remarks look stupid. You don't want to do that, do you? --Ludvikus (talk) 22:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS: You can find the Original 1934 edition of this "book" in microform at the New York Public Library. --Ludvikus (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]