User talk:Tigertas

This is Tigertas's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hi Tigertas! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:56, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Louise Bloomfield (Alderman) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Louise Bloomfield (Alderman). Thanks! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 08:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louise Bloomfield (Alderman) (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources do not establish notability per WP:GNG, and local politicians are not eligible for WP:NPOL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Louise Bloomfield (Alderman) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tigertas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Tigertas. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Louise Bloomfield (Alderman), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:56, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was asked if I had a conflict when I started the page. I have never started a page before, I have done minor edits but I have found myself with more time on my hands. My aim was to start adding pages of local identities from where I live (Tasmania). Tigertas (talk) 09:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but that doesn't really answer the question – do you have any sort of an external, ie. 'IRL' relationship with the subject? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I dont. Tigertas (talk) 12:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded the photo as your own work. This suggests you've been at close quarters with the person in question, who posed for you? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found the photo online and edited it. Look I had enough of this I don’t really care about the subject matter and haven’t got the energy to be cross examined like I’m at the witness box. I was looking for a hobby in my retirement and clearly Wikipedia is not going to be it. Delete the page. Tigertas (talk) 22:52, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]