User talk:TikkaTaylor

This is TikkaTaylor's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 06:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TikkaTaylor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 06:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TikkaTaylor/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:TikkaTaylor/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David.moreno72 06:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TikkaTaylor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a novice error, which will never be made again. I believed I had understood the process and protocol before submitting my article, yet I still panicked when I misunderstood instruction and thought my article was going to be published with the title TikkaTaylor, my user name. I wanted the article to be titled Cheeky Little Media, the name of the animation company I was covering, so I foolishly opened a new account called Cheeky Little Media, believing the article would now publish with this as the title. I then went to delete the TikkaTaylor account, but only then learnt that accounts cannot be deleted. So I had the same article out for review under different account names. I absolutely understand why the reviewing editor would block my account immediately, which is what happened. I understand I created my own issue by racing into something I clearly needed to seek guidance on before I proceeded, and that would be my approach in future, if given the opportunity. I would not attempt to publish the same article again, without first seeking advice and then approval from reviewing editors. I request that my account is unblocked, whilst I understand you may still wish to reject my initial article. Thanks for your time and consideration. TikkaTaylor (talk) 22:58, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TikkaTaylor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #28928 was submitted on 2020-02-11 01:38:52. This review is now closed.