User talk:Tipikal

March 2010[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Scott Xiao. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. --Rrburke^ekrubrR 21:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Scott Xiao has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. --Rrburke^ekrubrR 21:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Scott Xiao. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 21:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Scott Xiao. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 21:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott Xiao[edit]

The article Scott Xiao has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable: a handful of childrens' music competition awards, runner up in a spelling bee

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 13:48, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]