User talk:Tj16
December 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Utah monolith have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:59, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Utah monolith. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:09, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Materialscientist (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
UTRS decline
[edit]{{unblock|reason= i didn't know before how to make changes correctly & got flagged for wrong thing. now i will read all guidelines of how to add & what to add before adding in Wikipedia.i have no intention to do wrong , my question is ABC news put a link directing directly to their video & they're not flagged but me got fagged im sorry that i added in wrong manner so i will take care next time please unblock me ~~~~}}.Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #38277
--Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Tj16 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i didn't know before how to make changes correctly & got flagged for wrong thing. now i will read all guidelines of how to add & what to add before adding in Wikipedia.i have no intention to do wrong , my question is ABC news put a link directing directly to their video & they're not flagged but me got fagged im sorry that i added in wrong manner so i will take care next time please unblock me --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are expected to read the guidelines and policies before making an unblock request. Please do so, then explain why your edits were inappropriate and how your future edits would be different. Yamla (talk) 18:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
unblock
[edit]there are many spams & misleading links in the extral links but you only find my mistake to be the one to be blocked. I accept that I made a mistake will not happen next time. Tj16 (talk) 18:03, 8 December 2020 (UTC)