User talk:Tjklj11
Welcome![edit]
Hi Tjklj11! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Previous account?[edit]
Hi Tjklj11,
have you edited Wikipedia under a different name before?
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Block[edit]
Tjklj11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I admit I am Tknifton and Lavalizard101. I have been told to appeal to arbcom. I have tried this twice now. Both times it appears that my appeal is being sat on. The first time I appealed to arbcom it was over a month before I was told that my appeal was declined. During this time I decided that I would attempt a quiet return as User:TKnifton as I felt my unblock appeal was being ignored by arbcom. When that account got blocked I attempted to lie (quite badly I'll admit) as I was frustrated by the fact that it appeared as if my unblock requests wouldn't be taken seriously if I told the truth (I felt I would most likely get told to go to arbcom and wait even longer to have my block reviewed). Upon further review and after some time with no wi-fi during august I decided to put the past behind me and attempt to appeal again to arbcom. I was told that they were going to consider the unblock in a response received in mid september only for me to again get no response for over a month (I have still not gotten a response). It genuinely seems to me that arbcom don't want to actually do anything on my appeals. I know that arbcom are busy, but it feels that they are just palming me off and not wanting to do anything. I thought I would attempt a second quiet return with this current account.
Further, the blocks are coming across as punitive rather than preventative towards me as no active disruption is taking place (or was taking place on the TKnifton account). Tjklj11 (talk) 22:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Given your history of sock puppetry, lying, and the little rant below about how you intend to continue engaging in sock puppetry, you're now site banned per WP:3X. When you grow up and stop engaging in sock puppetry, make a request via WP:UTRS from your original account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:50, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I'll also note that it seems to me that the reason I was told to go to arbcom after attempting a second Standard offer was simply because the reviewing admins didn't want to deal with my unblock request at the time (the checkuser evidence was stale and after a cursory look at the time on WP:CHECKUSER, i got the impression that once stale nothing could be done with that data thus making any unblock request which was based on that moot). Tjklj11 (talk) 23:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Another point to add, according to checkuser policy, a CU should only be run in order to prevent or reduce potential or actual disruption and a check must be appropriate and necessary. Tjklj11 (talk) 23:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- I am also going to invoke WP:IAR in regards to the WP:SOCK and WP:Block Evasion]] policies as these two policies are the only policies being violated here. Tjklj11 (talk) 23:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- If "acceptable" I would like my account User:Tknifton to become my main account as I was originally going to rename my Lavalizard101 account TKnifton to make it easier to disclose any COI's in future wi rgds to me being a paleontology student who hopefully will end up publishing papers after they graduate. Tjklj11 (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- I have shown that I can be a productive, constructive editor, but it genuinely seems that because of a misdemeanor that no-one is willing to give me a chance to return to being constructive. I know and understand that what I did was wrong and regret ever doing the badhand sockpuppetry, but it appears no-one is willing on your end to forgive and forget. Tjklj11 (talk) 23:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)