User talk:Tmdrehrb
Speedy deletion of Image:Kiko -Mizuhara- Daniel17.JPG
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Image:Kiko -Mizuhara- Daniel17.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
- state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
- add the relevant copyright tag.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Kiko -Mizuhara- Daniel17.JPG|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Polly (Parrot) 02:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Todd, the reason for declining is not based on precedents, but each contribution is separately assessed. For Kiko Mizuhara I did a google search and only found a few dozen hits. For a currently famous person I expect to see a much bigger web footprint. It may of course be due to insular Japanese with little presence in the English language. If you consider her article worthwhile you can make it! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
I need your help; It is time to update this entry on Kiko "Mizuhara" Daniel (水原希子) Graeme a year makes a difference; please consider the following;
http://www.nipponcinema.com/tag/kiko_mizuhara/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Wood_(novel)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kishin_Shinoyama
http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/7yhrxmCixxM/
http://people.zozo.jp/teruyan/ki/26099?kw=_____K_%5B___Y_R___N_V____
http://www.hudie.com/bbs/343487p1p1
http://www.joseishi.net/vivi/vivimodels/vivimodels.html
Goggle images this(水原希子) more than 10 pages of hits
http://news.google.com/news/story?hl=ja&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en-us&q=水原希子++ノルウェイの森&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ncl=dP6cTbR-vTqh9zM&ei=R5EMSqOSEZKgM8qX6akG&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&cd=1&resnum=1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.136.87.53 (talk) 21:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Graeme, thanks you input. I have found a wiki page in Japanese exists [ http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%B0%B4%E5%8E%9F%E5%B8%8C%E5%AD%90 ]. I will work on translateing this to english. Big in Japan or google requires more Kanji I suppose. Anyway, I imagine localizing a wiki-page will meet less scrutiny than trying to start from scratch or convince others a fashion model may have relavancy in an encyclopaedic world.
Also found this definition; Encyclopedia, noun: A reference work (often in several volumes) containing articles on various topics (often arranged in alphabetical order) dealing with the entire range of human knowledge or with some particular speciality.
So, I think regardless of how many hits a english(水原希子) google search reveals; articles on various topics dealing with the entire range of human knowledge or with some particular speciality, users can be served by a localized english version.
{{helpme}} I may need some assistance, are you willing to tutor me on wiki formating if I mess up?
Anyway, thanks again.
All the best!
Todd --TMDREHRB 07:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)tmdrehrb
- Hi Todd, I can help you out with wikisyntax. My first suggestion to you is to sign your talk with the four tilde characters, ~~~~. The next suggestion is to add your talk to the bottom of the talk page, then I can find it easier. Let me know if you have something you want tme to look at. There may be automatic translators eg on google to convert that page for you. The Japanese page may have good references or lead to finding thousands of hits that would show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok thanks mate!
[edit]I appreciate your help. I will get to work on this localization. Keep an eye out here(watchlist or other?) and you can proof things and make suggestions, as they happen. Stand by a little though. In the mean time; what do you work on mainly? Anyway, again thanks. Hope to hear from you again soon. All the best!
Todd
TMDREHRB 08:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)tmdrehrb
- Most of my work looks like it is counter vandalism! There are enough pages on my watchlist that I see various negative edits. I have a plan to work on regional geology, especially Australia, and possibly some other countries, such as Iberia, Nauru, and over time may include other countries. Also I have done some work on historical people from Friesland, and my local Canberra area.
- With your documents on oil recovery and exploration, can you identify areas in wikipedia that are deficient? I have little knowlege in this area, most of which comes from reading a book written by Reg Sprigg and another on microbes that eat petroleum. But I can certainly help you with wikisyntax, liking in articles, redirects, categories, and projects.
- For your signature block it does not seem to link back to your user or talk page. I just use the default one that does that! else you will need something like [[User talk:Tmdrehrb]] in it to get User talk:Tmdrehrb. My signature: Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)