User talk:Token2k6

starting the talk page, working on my first article with images.

Welcome!

Hello, Token2k6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Hi, It looks like no one warned you about the impending deletion of the picture. Anyway basically Google Maps are not free enough for Wikipedia to use. Their licensing has extra restrictions beyond the creative commons licenses that can be used on Wikipedia. Some alternative possibilities are that you draw a picture yourself, or with great difficulty get a camera up in the air, on a plane, balloon, kite and take your own aerial photo, Nasa shots are free of copyright, so if you can find one that zooms in enough you can use that. A recent map I did myself was File:Balk map.png which used a base of an aeroplane photo from someone else. You can still use the Google map as a reference though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:35, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GamesPeoplePlayFM1960.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GamesPeoplePlayFM1960.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 05:40, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GamesPeoplePlayFM1960.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GamesPeoplePlayFM1960.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:41, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:CastleGolfMiniCastle.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CastleGolfMiniCastle.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natural Pawz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natural Pawz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Pawz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 23:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Castle Golf and Games

The article Castle Golf and Games has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

doesn't appear to have ever been a notable park, just some minor local coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:45, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]