User talk:Tony254trill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Tony254trill, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Everyone is encouraged to edit Wikipedia, but there are several guidelines you should be aware of before you do any further editing like that you did to Cassie Steele.

  • Reliable sources: IMDB is not considered a reliable source because it is editable by anyone. It often contains misinformation. Please see WP:RELIABLE for more information about reliable sources. IMDB is appropriate as an external link, but not a cited source of information.
  • Copyrights: Prose should not be directly copied from another site. This is considered a copyright violation. Please see WP:COPYRIGHT for more information.
  • Naming Conventions: After the first mention of a subject’s name, it is normal practice to refer to them by their last name. Please see WP:SURNAME for more information.
  • Notable and Encyclopedic content: trivial information, such as hobbies, favorite things, and the like should be avoided.
  • You might also want to browse the policies for biographies of living people at WP:BLP.

Welcome to Wikipedia! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles[edit]

Please read WP:MUSICBIO to see what a musical performer needs to have achieved before he can have a Wikipedia article. Your articles about yourself and your forthcoming album have been deleted because it does not seem that your career has (yet) reached that stage. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and only reports on people and things that are already established, not the up and coming. Also, please read WP:Autobiography for the reasons why you should not be writing about yourself. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tony254trill (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked from Wikipedia for a long time. You guys take this stuff real seriously. Anyways thought while I was requesting un blockage I'd request that you check user Khaledfooty. He is not a sock puppet of mine. If you don't believe me use check user. I thought I'd throw that out there. Anyway we've been going at this for a long time. There's nothing you can really do to stop me from editing on Wikipedia. I edit from a school computer so you block a lot of innocent people I go to school with. I have another account ya'll are not aware of on the computer at my house. It's a different IP address(so it can't be tracked by check user), and ya can never stop me from editing on Wikipedia. So if you unblock me now I'll only edit from this account. So what do you say about starting over fresh? Otherwise I'll just edit on another account from my house.

Decline reason:

Threatening socking is an exceptionally stupid way to request unblocking. Just for future reference. Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tony254trill (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hey been awhile. I've been editing on my new account for a long time now, editing other pages so I won't be detected. I thought I'd let you know who is not me. So the following accounts you blocked I didn't make. These accounts are Khaledfooty, NewOrleans4Life, MiamiFloridaBabii, Rayman95, ScottieAngelo, Michael Jeffrey Kyle JR, 25 To Life Homiez, MikeVickNumberOneFan, Rose Marie Aragon, and pretty much all the other females you blocked. That's makes me laugh. I did not parade around as a woman. If they are in the same area as me that's funny but I didn't make any of them. Anyway you should un block me because I've learned my lesson and wish to abide by the rules of wikipedia rather then edit on my other account that you don't know about. I simply can't edit my favorite pages right now so I'd lke to start over. So consider my offer. Its been years now.-Tony254trill (talk) 10:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to be telling us that if this account is not unblocked you will continue to edit via sockpuppet accounts, and yet you say "I've learned my lesson and wish to abide by the rules of wikipedia..." That doesn't add up. If you want to be unblocked then I suggest that you indicate that you really will "abide by the rules", not that you will abide by the rules as long as it suits you but ignore them otherwise. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Advising us that you have been openly flaunting the rules by evading a valid block certainly does not show us that "you have learned your lesson and wish to abide by the rules" (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]