User talk:Torrenceg

Welcome!

Hello, Torrenceg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 05:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)--Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 05:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if you want to take something to deletion review, please do so but stop editing a closed case. L0b0t (talk) 15:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rob_capriccioso

A tag has been placed on Rob_capriccioso, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Rob_capriccioso is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Rob_capriccioso saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. L0b0t (talk) 19:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Rob capriccioso

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Rob capriccioso, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Rob capriccioso was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Rob capriccioso, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Single purpose accounts and "sock puppet"s

Hi Torrenceg. You appear to have created an account solely to comment on pages related to Rob Capriccioso and to support the endeavours of User:Hochungra. While Wikipedia assumes good faith, please note that it is against Wikipedia policy to create a second account when you are already a registered user, especially with aim of supporting your original account in arguments by appearing to be a different person with a similar viewpoint. It is also against Wikipedia policy to create an account solely with the intention of supporting a friend or colleague in a Wikipedia discussion. Our policy on such actions can be found at WP:SOCK, and penalties for engaging in it including permanent bannings, and permanent bannings of the account that you are supporting. On the assumption that you are a good faith user who has been editing responsibly for some time and have only recently created an account, or that you were not aware of the relevant policies, can I suggest you avoid taking part in contentious issues until you have built a demonstrable history of good faith edits, to avoid accusations which, whether true or not, may hurt Hochungra in his attempt to create and preserve an article on Rob Capriccioso? Many thanks. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:21, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hochungra for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]