User talk:Trakhtenberg
Speedy deletion nomination of Self-Perceived Quality of Life Scale
[edit]
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Self-Perceived Quality of Life Scale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 15:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
advice
[edit]t's about a program accessed through a web site, so As reviewing administrator, I did not delete it via speedy. However, you need to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases . And, do not copy from a web site or previous publication, as seems to be the case here from the reference format. -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone with not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. For further information see our FAQ about business, organisations, and articles like this. I advise you to improve this article very quickly, before the article gets deleted by a regular deletion process. DGG ( talk ) 17:39, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
would this solve the problem?
[edit]I added references. Also, a book based on the dissertation is now in press. It is being published by an academic publisher, the VDM Publishing House http://www.vdm-publishing.com/index.php. It has already being published by ProQuest UMI Dissertation Publishing, which also involves peer-review and is considered a gold standard for validating dissertation research. Here is a link: http://gradworks.umi.com/33/05/3305319.html Also, I can include a link to the abstract for presentation at the American Psychological Association convention. For research to be accepted for presentation at the American Psychological Association convention, it has to be peer-reviewed and approved. So, the acceptance is usually considered as an award and acknowledgement.
File:Table2spql.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Table2spql.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Table2aspql.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Table2aspql.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
All the files I uploaded are mine. They are from my dissertation for which I have full copyrights. I do not mind other people using my files. I will put the file back, please do not delete it again. (Ephraim C. Trakhtenberg, Ph.D. (talk) 20:45, 5 February 2011 (UTC)).
File copyright problem with File:LifespanFig2a.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:LifespanFig2a.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
All the files I uploaded are mine. They are from my dissertation for which I have full copyrights. I do not mind other people using my files. If this is the case, do I still need to add copyright tags? Thanks! (Ephraim C. Trakhtenberg, Ph.D. (talk) 20:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)).
Could someone with appropriate credentials please remove the tag which marks this article for deletion?
[edit]I added a reference for a book about this scale published by an academic publisher and a reference to a clinical use of this scale for monitoring quality of life of women living with HIV. I did not publish more academic works about this scale because I requalified from psychology to neurobiology. Present academic references and clinical use of the scale definitely establish sufficient notability. Could someone with appropriate credentials please remove the tag which marks this article for deletion?
File:LifespanFig2.jpg missing description details
[edit]
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)File:Table2bspql.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Table2bspql.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 22:17, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:LSFig2aa.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:LSFig2aa.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DMacks (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
